Anonymous

What is "God" to you?

21

21 Answers

Tom  Jackson Profile
Tom Jackson answered

The concept is intellectually fascinating.

The reality is delightful and wondrous.

5 People thanked the writer.
View all 4 Comments
Tom  Jackson
Tom Jackson commented
Could be there is something wrong with your perception of the reality.
Deleted Account
Deleted Account commented
No, that's my point. There CAN'T be anything wrong with a person's perception of reality, because that means it's only wrong compared to YOUR reality, and not theirs. It can be unique for every person. Peoples realities can be perceived differently. That's what stops everyone being exactly the same. If you perceive my perception as wrong in this case, you are simply disagreeing with me on the concept of god, and telling me there is something wrong with me because of that, which is insulting.

(When I said reality was dull and painful, that was not an insult.)

In the land of the blind, the man with one eye is the king,
But in the land of the dark, the man with the light is a target,
Even though it's unrelated to what I said above.
Tom  Jackson
Tom Jackson commented
You say that your experience of reality is painful and dull---and I can accept that.

But If reality IS painful and dull by nature, then there is no hope for anyone who perceives it that way.

If there is a reality that exists independently of your perception of it, then the problem might be with your perception of it.
Didge Doo Profile
Didge Doo answered

God was an idea created by primitive people to explain things they didn't yet understand.

R.I.P Big Feller.

12 People thanked the writer.
View all 28 Comments
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
1- You
a] reject the laws outlined in what was scripture to Jesus and which you call the OLD Testament,

b] attribute to the Christ the trinity, a doctrine he never taught in what you call the NEW Testament and regard as your scripture, and

c] refuse to accept the FINAL Testament, scripture of a faith recognised by your own church as being foremost among other paths to salvation, even though it came to remove inconsistencies and distortions that have crept into earlier scriptures.

Despite all that you say to me, who HAS accepted the FT, "you never downloaded the updates." oh, the irony!

2- "If you later notice that God has in fact revealed---by whatever means He has chosen---His trinitarian nature, then how are you going to proceed from that point?" As a person guided by reason I would subject it to reason, as God would expect me to, and follow the outcome.
Tom  Jackson
Tom Jackson commented
@Just Ice

2) So if you notice that He has in fact revealed it, you would still subject His revelation to the test of human reason.

Perhaps there should have been a beatitude for people like you--blessed are those who go around in circles, for they will be know as "big wheels."

Your interpretations of scripture offer me no insight and fail to match the contribution of others---not the least of whom are God the father and Jesus Christ.

But enough for now. You are simply a waste of my time.
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
1- "So if you notice that He has in fact revealed it, you would still subject His revelation to the test of human reason." Of course. It goes without saying. You blindly believed, didn't you, without applying any reason, that "He has in fact revealed it" Look at how confusing and unsupported by Jesus and God it has turned out to be. Why should I be foolish and fall in the same trap? Wise are those who learn from the errors of others.

2- As for "You are simply a waste of my time." it brings to mind Matthew 5:5 "Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth." - but wait a minute, those are the words of the Christ in your scripture. They carry no weight with you. That's why you posted that haughty remark. You are a rock hard believer in only that which the Christ HAS NOT taught in your scripture. Figures. :)
Call me Z Profile
Call me Z answered

Just another in a long procession of mythical characters man created to assuage the fear of death, address the unexplainable, and prop up the cause of the clergy.

G reatest

O bvious

D eception

No need to revisit the incalculable suffering, death and destruction wrought in the name of this spurious concept. 

Toxic Hairball Profile
Toxic Hairball answered

A sad and enduring falsehood.

8 People thanked the writer.
View all 5 Comments
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
TH you're right that the existence of unicorns "hasn't been disproven" However, humanity has no good, credible reason to postulate their existence.
Toxic Hairball
Toxic Hairball commented
Just Ice- That's correct. And as this is an opinion question, I and others here as you have seen, hold the opinion there is no "good, credible reason to postulate" any gods existence either. Until you or someone else can show god IS, beyond any question, it will remain my opinion.
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
1- God IS by inference.

2- Science too relies heavily on inference. A lot of science is based on it. It plays an extremely important role.
Twallgirl Wallace Profile

Revelation 4:11 tells us that God is worthy to have our praise and honor and Glory because he created all things and it is because of him that we exist. When I look around in creation I see his existence in the air we breath, the animals and his most wonderful creation of all, mankind

Abigail Connor Profile
Abigail Connor answered

I've thought about this a lot recently whilst questioning my religion, and I've finally come up with an answer. To me, it's a state of...being, I guess? I don't know many people that found god just by going to church every day because they think they're just supposed to, usually some event happens that opens your eyes and makes you seek out something to explain it all. There's a black hole in the center of our galaxy, maybe you'd find god there. Maybe you'd find it in a box in your mothers attic or in a newborns eyes, who knows.

Darik Majoren Profile
Darik Majoren answered

It is the myth belief and stories that primitive thinking man came up with to answer questions about our natural world long before we knew how to look and follow the evidence.

10 People thanked the writer.
View all 12 Comments
Darik Majoren
Darik Majoren commented
JI - For #1 "That which we do not know . . we simply do not know." is true, but that which begs an explanation we [the clever, bold and imaginative among us] have always provided at least one explanation [theory] for it." - Attributing Clever and Bold to imaginary storytelling doesn't really "Fit" . . . It does make one ponder that if God were real, there would be no need to apply either "Cleverness or Boldness" here . . .It would simply be an observation of the natural, which would only be to observe and record . . . That being said . . . being okay with "Not knowing" AND "Not needing to insert a story from our primitive ancestors" in a largely populated world were this is "The Norm" . . . is most likely the boldest. In some countries this will easily get you killed . . .

For #2 "the further we go the better the technology gets and makes better use of or finds additional evidence to follow . . " is similar to the process by which our knowledge in the religious sphere progresses. Both are driven by human minds." - That's just it . . our knowledge of the religious sphere HAS NOT progressed at all . . . alterations of interpretations DO NOT change the original text of a religious document. It is LITTERALLY the being evolved to fit the current cultural and societal changes . . . A good example is how the infallible Bible has to have it's Old Testament now be allegorically interpreted because of the overwhelming evidence for Evolution and the age of the earth.
Darik Majoren
Darik Majoren commented
Regarding #3 - "Nothing wrong with #1 or #2 What is wrong is what TZ has identified, and that is, "refusing to weigh the case against magic once the maturity of critical faculty is attained." It's a bit like refusing to weigh the case against a flat earth once the maturity of critical faculty has attained a level which can no longer support a flat earth. " - I disagree . . . a better comparison would be not of a flat earth, but in a child's belief in Santa Claus. You must apply a Supernatural belief where maturity of critical faculty breeds "Reasonable Skepticism" to the scenario . . . You've applied a limitation due to the lack of technology of natural observance to the advancement of technology to the point of observing and understand a natural thing . . . No magic or supernatural connotations needed . . .
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
"Not needing to insert a story from our primitive ancestors" . . . is most likely the boldest. In some countries this will easily get you killed . . ."
a] it's the laziest, very unlike science

b] we do not espouse what our primitive ancestors believed. it is modified and updated. A process approved by science.

c] no gets killed for beliefs, maybe for spreading them.

2- "the infallible Bible has to have it's Old Testament now be allegorically interpreted because of the overwhelming evidence for Evolution and the age of the earth."- so that too is wrong and not worthy of credit? [damned if you do and damned if you don't eh]

3- I'm not sure there is an issue to disagree over here. I was referring to refusal to move on from the Bible's allusion to a flat earth, but Santa Claus or the tooth fairy will illustrate the point equally well, I think.
Otis Campbell Profile
Otis Campbell answered

I have yet to try to understand gods ways

7 People thanked the writer.
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
"Thus [it is]: no change wilt thou ever find in God’s way; and no deviation wilt thou ever find in God’s way!" HQ 35:43
Ray  Dart Profile
Ray Dart answered

He/she/it is the subject of a lot of questions asked anonymously but answered volubly, often by people who have never actually "thought" about he/she/it.

If you can't understand something, invent a god - "He/she/it did it!"

Don't like the idea of dying? Invent an afterlife, you'll need a god in charge of that (and some abstruse rules about qualification for entry).

Need something to cling on to? Create an eternal father(mother/gender neutral being).

Need a reason to inflict war and suffering? Invent a WHOLE religion, with built-in cant and bigotry.

6 People thanked the writer.
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
What if we put aside answers "by people who have never actually "thought" about" it and focus on the answers of those who have given it a lot of thought?
Ray  Dart
Ray Dart commented
Unfortunately religious scholars differ wildly over the "nature of god" (I come from a family dominated by religious adherents, and my immediate family, growing up contained two "men of the cloth" - I live next door to a "Clerk in Holy Orders" (Parish Priest to you and me). Put them all in the same room and I guarantee that they only thing they would all agree on would be to disagree.

The trouble when you combine blind faith with human imagination is that it can take you anywhere, and you will always be right, a problem with all religions.

I worked in the "King Fahad Complex for the production of the Holy Quran" near Madinah for a while. When bad (i.e. faulty) pages were produced there was a constant discussion as to whether they should be destroyed as they were effectively an insult to Allah as a corruption of his teachings or whether to destroy them would also be an affront, because of the rest of the wisdom on the page.

Multiply this nonsense by 1000 times and you see why "thinking" about a god is a bit of a problem.

Finally, take time to google for "contradictions in the bible" (and there are many). You will see that they are "explained away" in different ways by different "thinkers".

So, blind faith doesn't work, and considered analysis is actually usually just opinion.........
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
1- but surely ALL "considered analysis is actually usually just opinion........." because it is carried out in human minds. So is it ok to dismiss all considered analysis?

2- It is normal and ok, is it not, to accept considered analysis we see no obvious flaw in and agree with.

3- The more "wide differences" there are between scholars the more choice we have, no?

4- And that's a healthy thing, isn't it?
Tris Fray Potter Profile

What ancient civilisations (and some modern ones too) used to help them understand the world.

5 People thanked the writer.
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
He continues to provide the only complete understanding of the world.
Tris Fray Potter
Tris Fray Potter commented
I'm not saying that God isn't real; there is a chance that he is. I just think that we can explain the universe better using science.
Just out of curiosity, how do you explain every other religion where people believe in their God/s just as much as you believe in yours?
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
TFP
1- I agree that "we can explain the universe better using science" and we should use science wherever it's the best most reliable tool.

2- "Just out of curiosity, how do you explain every other religion where people believe in their God/s just as much as you believe in yours?" I like the Islamic perspective because it makes sense and is inclusive.

a] If there is a God and He wants humanity to be guided He wouldn't wait till Moses, Jesus or Mohammed was born to send His guidance. He would have sent guidance to all people wherever and whenever they existed.

b] Each guidance was suited to the time and place it was sent to. However, the central message of all of them was the same:

God is one. He is the creator of everything and no one knows His creation better than He does. So it's in the best interest of humanity to follow His guidance.

c] Consequently Islam teaches that all had salvation who followed the guidance most appropriate to them.

d] Muslims believe that all earlier scriptures are either lost or are heavily corrupted, and that the latest scripture, the Holy Qur'an [HQ] is the Final Testament for mankind and that's why it contains a promise of preservation from corruption and loss. The word for word memorisation of the HQ by millions around the world, a tradition started with Mohammed and continued to his day, has guaranteed the preservation of the HQ.
Ally Gh Profile
Ally Gh answered

God is an entity created by the human mind to control the lives of the other people. Doesn't exist

3 People thanked the writer.
View all 7 Comments
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
Check it out. Neither Big bang nor evolution is solid evidence for God "Doesn't exist"
Ally Gh
Ally Gh commented
Oh they are. They are solid evidence to show how the universe has created itself...
Read Stephen Hawkins
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
"how the universe has created itself..." indeed how can material create itself?
Anonymous Profile
Anonymous answered

Nothingness to me, I gave up with believing the  false hopes and lies that were passed down from generation to generation,  Reality was more difficult to accept but now i accept the fact that when i die, or when my parents and other family members pass etc..  We'll never see each other ever again- the bible itself never promised that you'll see your loved ones anway- and it even says that all of your former memories will be forgotten.

3 People thanked the writer.
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
"the bible itself never promised that you'll see your loved ones anway" maybe, but the Bible is not the only book which people claim to be from God. The HQ [Holy Qur'an] is also claimed to be from God. At HQ 13:23-24 it says, "gardens of perpetual bliss, which they shall enter together with the righteous from among their parents, their spouses, and their offspring; and the angels will come unto them from every gate [and will say]: "Peace be upon you, because of your perseverance!" How excellent, then, this final abode!"
Michael Poland Profile
Michael Poland answered

god is a particle not a person.

Everywhere you look and everywhere

you don't there it is. Look in the mirror

it is there staring back. Yes, You are the

god you seek. So if things go wrong,

or if things go right, it's all you.

Don't blame god.

Just Ice Profile
Just Ice answered

what is God?

1- God has been different things to different people throughout the ages and continues to be so to this day.

2- People believe in the existence of all sorts of alien life out
there because we don't, as yet, have any simple, clear, indisputable, facts to
permanently eliminate all possibilities of the existence of alien life. If
there were such facts nobody would believe in the existence of any form of
alien life. However, because we have no such facts we have some weird and
wonderful descriptions of aliens.

3- Similarly people believe in the existence of all sorts of God
because we don't as yet, have any simple, clear, indisputable, facts to
permanently eliminate all possibilities of the existence of God. If there were
such facts nobody would believe in the existence of any form of god. However,
because we have no such facts we have some weird and wonderful descriptions of
God.

4- An additional and very strong factor in support of belief in God
is the fact that such belief provides answers to fundamental questions about
existence and life which otherwise remain unanswered. Most people give in to
that part of human nature that demands answers to such questions.

5- So we can't, at least for now, eliminate belief in God. However,
what we CAN and perhaps SHOULD do is to challenge those beliefs about God and
religion which may have been readily acceptable to, or enforceable upon, man
twenty centuries ago but are no longer so because they're

a) inconsistent within themselves, for example, describing God as
immortal yet insisting that He died, or

b) inconsistent with fully established and unanimously accepted
facts, for example, the belief that there were no humans on earth 7000 years
ago, or

c) do not make rational sense, for example, to send someone
innocent and obedient to death so that the guilty and rebellious can be set
free.

6- To me God is

- the primordial cause of the Big Bang

- the author of all the laws which govern everything in the universe [the so called laws of nature]

- best described by the HQ

1 Person thanked the writer.
Toxic Hairball
Toxic Hairball commented
Just Ice- in all of your well stated answer, the key words you say are "To me God is..." thats it. The rest is opinion, and from the view of others, a flawed one. That is the essence of this entire question. You say very clearly why YOU accept this story, but it is an opinion, no more supported than ours, in fact, I declare even less effectively so.

I ask you to just ponder why one all knowing god would permit his beloved creation to follow such widely different beliefs about him, especially the among the most devout. Why these holy text contradict themselves and each other. I say without reservation because men invented them and him and every other god.

The concept you favor is good for you, but is lacking (or wrong) to more than half of humanity who have other views, just as credible to them. Im sure you get that.
Just Ice
Just Ice commented
1- everything that comes from human mind is opinion - that's not a valid basis for rejection.

2- Calling an opinion flawed is not by itself a valid reason for rejection. One needs to identify the "flaw" and show that it is a flaw.

3- "because men invented them" is not by itself a valid reason for rejection either. After all, everything expressed in words is, at a certain level, "invented" by man.

4- I fully agree with your last paragraph. We arrive at different conclusions depending on the factors we include in our evaluations and how rigorous that evaluation is.
mary adam Profile
mary adam answered

A source of comfort and hope, that this rotten old world isn't it, and that what we do in life counts in the bigger scheme of things, the alternative is that nothing we do in life counts in the bigger scheme of things, not even our existence. 

Without God, you could cure cancer, climb a mountain, write a best seller, have children, but you will die and that will be it. Your children will die, there children will die, the world will end and everything that has gone before will not matter. 

You could rob an elderly persons home, kill people, torture animals, make people live in poverty whilst you live of their hard labour, and when you die, it ends.  There would be no ultimate meaning to your existence just as much as the previous example. 

Saying, that in the here and now matters, but that's only because of your ego, when you die, your family die, everyone dies, there is no one to reflect on the meaning of life, or it's importance. It is insignificant, it will not matter. There is no third party to say how great it was, or how bad it was, it's over. It started for no reason, and ends for no reason, so everything in between has no reason. People go on about meaning and morality in what they do, but in a life without ultimate meaning and morality, there is no meaning or morality just indifference, not even that, because when it's there is no "mind" to ponder upon life's existence. 

This for me, is where humans are different, we are able to have thoughts about our thoughts, and those thoughts come from somewhere, our dreams come from somewhere.

We have complex lives, we have a whole work system, economy, TV, internet, cars, public transport systems, roads, we create art, we created math (no animal understands math), we have more than one language for our species. We seek to extend our lives. We take care of the weak. We make materials like plastic that are not straight from the earth. We filter water, we cannot drink straight water like animals can without dying of some disease. We cannot eat food like animals can without dying of some disease.  We live in concrete, not a natural habitat, we are in fact alien to the world in which we find ourselves. We don't adapt to our environment, we adapt our environment to suit us.  We have feelings of horror when we see injustice, we have a description like injustice. We have a law system in a world were there is no ultimate morality or right or wrong. That doesn't make any sense.

 People are just as dependent on science as others are on God, no one thinks for themselves. It's now as easy to fool people with science as atheists claim with God, it just depends on who you want to believe. Unless you carry out experiments for yourself you are just relying on someone else's idea.  It is so easy to stand by the ego and say science is right because you care that if you said anything to contradict it that you wouldn't be classed as "logical or reasonable."  Yet we are emotional beings, we are beings that create things that bring out feelings of awe and wonder.  We are not solely logical or reasonable in fact far from it thank goodness or we'd all be robotic and ruthless.  We belong to something far greater far more wonderful, and we are part of it's tapestry, not something that exists and ends for no reason.

Damara Wong Profile
Damara Wong , INTJ, music lover, answered

I grew up in a Catholic family but I kept on falling out of the band wagon and turning my back against it.

God is someone or rather something that can't be described. He's a paradox and an unanswered question which the answer is also himself.

thanked the writer.
Tom  Jackson
Tom Jackson commented
Faith has nothing to do with a band wagon for a Catholic.

God can be described; He is not a paradox, and He is not an unanswered question.

You just have been too lazy to study theology.

Answer Question

Anonymous